ÿÈÕ³Ô¹Ï

Bribing Students to Get Good Grades: The Debate

Updated
|
Bribing Students to Get Good Grades: The Debate
This piece explores the controversial practice of offering monetary rewards to students for good grades. It examines studies conducted in various cities, discussing the effectiveness of such programs and the ethical concerns they raise. The article presents arguments from both supporters and critics of this approach to student motivation.

Students are often given rewards by parents when they bring home a sound report card. High school students who excel in academics, sports or other activities are often given monetary incentives to attend particular colleges through scholarships. Why not pay students in primary and secondary schools for making the grade as well?

Studies have recently been conducted to determine whether monetary rewards by the school district would motivate at-risk students to achieve better in school. While the results of these studies have been mixed, the debate over the idea is unmistakable. Although some believe that any method of enticing kids to perform well in school is fair game, others see paying cash for grades as an unnecessary way to encourage students to do what they should already be achieving. Who's right? Let's take a look at both sides of the debate to see.

The Four-City Study

Harvard economist Roland Frye recently conducted a test to find out if offering students monetary rewards for performing well in school could bring up scores on standardized tests. Frye's research results were published in last spring. The study looked at schools in four major cities across the United States: Chicago, Dallas, Washington, and New York.

In New York, fourth through seventh-grade students were paid for their grades on tests. In Chicago, ninth-grade kids were paid for the grades on their report cards. In Washington, middle schoolers earned money based on five different metrics, including behavior and attendance. Second-graders in Dallas were paid for every book they read and the computerized test they took on the book.

The study found that the students who paid for test scores and grades in New York and Chicago did not improve their performance on standardized tests. The Washington students who were rewarded for attendance and behavior showed some improvement on their standardized reading tests, but the most significant gains were seen in the Dallas kids. These second-graders encouraged to read more books in class showed marked improvement in their standardized reading exams.

In a piece in the , it was also noted that the students in Washington who showed the most significant gains in test scores were usually the hardest to reach. Boys responded better than girls, and the kids with a history of behavioral problems saw the most significant improvement overall.

Toronto Following Suit?

Because of the results of studies like the one above, other schools with a high percentage of at-risk students also consider adding monetary rewards to motivate children to perform better. According to the , Toronto's public school board is also considering a program to pay kids in disadvantaged areas to do well in school as a part of an anti-poverty plan.

The argument in Toronto is that the schools in this city were designed to cater to middle-class students. Those who don't fall into this category may be at a disadvantage. Jan Olsen, a Barrie principal, told the Star, "We need to change the system so everybody can learn." Olsen recently banned homework at his school because he was concerned that it wasn't fair for children who did not have support at home – or even a home to go to after school.

Motivation or Bribery?

While numerous school districts are considering monetary rewards for students, others compare the idea of bribing students with money that could otherwise go to reducing class sizes and improving the quality of technology in the classroom. In an op-ed piece on , Diane Ravitch makes the case that in other countries, students must pay to go to the best secondary schools if they want to make it into the technology colleges after graduation. If these students scrimp and save to create opportunities for themselves, what are we teaching our children by paying them to do something they are expected to do anyway?

At the end of her piece, Ravitch asks, "Does the future belong to those who struggle to better themselves, make sacrifices to do so and work hard? Or to those who must be cajoled and bribed to learn anything at all?"

The debate continues over whether students should receive financial gain when they perform well in public schools. This idea of monetary reward is just one more innovative solution that can and should be explored to its fullest if we are to truly make our educational system equitable for every student who attends. While a case may be made to the detriment of bribing students to make grades, it doesn't change the fact that the world of public education has plenty of room for improvement today.

Questions? Contact us on Facebook and Instagram. @publicschoolreview.

#StudentMotivation #AcademicIncentives #EducationDebate #GradeBribes #StudentPerformance #publicschools

Additional Resources [+]

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the results of paying students for grades in the Four–City Study?
The Four–City Study found that students in New York and Chicago paid for grades did not improve their standardized test scores, while Dallas second–graders paid for reading books showed marked improvement in reading exams.
Which group of students showed the most significant gains when rewarded for attendance and behavior in the Four–City Study?
Washington middle schoolers rewarded for attendance and behavior showed some improvement on standardized reading tests, with boys and kids with a history of behavioral problems showing the most significant gains.
What is Toronto's public school board considering to motivate at–risk students?
Toronto's public school board is considering paying kids in disadvantaged areas to do well in school as part of an anti–poverty plan.
What concerns do some critics have about paying students for good grades?
Critics argue that paying students money for grades could divert funds from reducing class sizes and improving classroom technology, and question what is taught when students are bribed to do what is expected.
How did Harvard economist Roland Frye's research publish its findings on monetary incentives and student performance?
Roland Frye's research was published in Time last spring, showing mixed results with monetary rewards increasing reading test scores mainly among younger students encouraged to read more books.

Recent Articles

Year-Round Schooling in 2026: Updated Parent Guide
Year-Round Schooling in 2026: Updated Parent Guide
Explore the latest 2026 data, trends, costs, and parent planning tips in the ongoing debate over year-round schooling vs the traditional calendar.
No Child Left Behind: Past, Present, and Future of U.S. School Policy
No Child Left Behind: Past, Present, and Future of U.S. School Policy
Explore how No Child Left Behind evolved into ESSA, what it means for 2025‑26 schooling, and what parents need to know about testing, admissions planning, and funding.
Understanding Public School Fees & Optional Costs Guide
Understanding Public School Fees & Optional Costs Guide
Discover what public school fees are required versus optional, with 2026 updates for parents, students, and educators on budgeting and planning.

Parenting and Learning Issues

PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT FROM K-12
Learn how direct involvement in your child’s education can impact school performance. Get expert advice on how to get involved, learn why and when you need to talk to a teacher and ways to make changes on campus.
More Articles
Read more articles (49)
Improving Learning (22) Bullying (7) Types of Learning (13) Kindergarten and Elementary Issues (11) High School Issues (42)